TSTP Solution File: NUM795^1 by cocATP---0.2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : cocATP---0.2.0
% Problem  : NUM795^1 : TPTP v7.0.0. Released v3.7.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : python CASC.py /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n095.star.cs.uiowa.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2609 0 2.40GHz
% Memory   : 32218.625MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.2.2.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Jan  8 13:11:46 EST 2018

% Result   : Theorem 0.44s
% Output   : Proof 0.44s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    : 0

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : NUM795^1 : TPTP v7.0.0. Released v3.7.0.
% 0.00/0.03  % Command  : python CASC.py /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.03/0.23  % Computer : n095.star.cs.uiowa.edu
% 0.03/0.23  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.03/0.23  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2609 0 @ 2.40GHz
% 0.03/0.23  % Memory   : 32218.625MB
% 0.03/0.23  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.2.2.el7.x86_64
% 0.03/0.23  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.03/0.23  % DateTime : Fri Jan  5 14:41:35 CST 2018
% 0.03/0.23  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.03/0.24  Python 2.7.13
% 0.44/0.63  Using paths ['/home/cristobal/cocATP/CASC/TPTP/', '/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/', '/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/']
% 0.44/0.63  FOF formula (<kernel.Constant object at 0x2ae9d340e1b8>, <kernel.Type object at 0x2ae9d340e998>) of role type named rat_type
% 0.44/0.63  Using role type
% 0.44/0.63  Declaring rat:Type
% 0.44/0.63  FOF formula (<kernel.Constant object at 0x2ae9d340e758>, <kernel.Constant object at 0x2ae9d340e7e8>) of role type named x0
% 0.44/0.63  Using role type
% 0.44/0.63  Declaring x0:rat
% 0.44/0.63  FOF formula (<kernel.Constant object at 0x2ae9d2989bd8>, <kernel.Constant object at 0x2ae9d340e7e8>) of role type named y0
% 0.44/0.63  Using role type
% 0.44/0.63  Declaring y0:rat
% 0.44/0.63  FOF formula (<kernel.Constant object at 0x2ae9d340e1b8>, <kernel.Constant object at 0x2ae9d340e758>) of role type named z0
% 0.44/0.63  Using role type
% 0.44/0.63  Declaring z0:rat
% 0.44/0.63  FOF formula (<kernel.Constant object at 0x2ae9d340e878>, <kernel.Constant object at 0x2ae9d2cead40>) of role type named u0
% 0.44/0.63  Using role type
% 0.44/0.63  Declaring u0:rat
% 0.44/0.63  FOF formula (<kernel.Constant object at 0x2ae9d340e758>, <kernel.DependentProduct object at 0x2ae9d2ceafc8>) of role type named lessis
% 0.44/0.63  Using role type
% 0.44/0.63  Declaring lessis:(rat->(rat->Prop))
% 0.44/0.63  FOF formula ((lessis x0) y0) of role axiom named l
% 0.44/0.63  A new axiom: ((lessis x0) y0)
% 0.44/0.63  FOF formula (<kernel.Constant object at 0x2ae9d340e7e8>, <kernel.DependentProduct object at 0x2ae9d2cead88>) of role type named less
% 0.44/0.63  Using role type
% 0.44/0.63  Declaring less:(rat->(rat->Prop))
% 0.44/0.63  FOF formula ((less z0) u0) of role axiom named k
% 0.44/0.63  A new axiom: ((less z0) u0)
% 0.44/0.63  FOF formula (<kernel.Constant object at 0x2ae9d2ceab00>, <kernel.DependentProduct object at 0x2ae9d2cead40>) of role type named pl
% 0.44/0.63  Using role type
% 0.44/0.63  Declaring pl:(rat->(rat->rat))
% 0.44/0.63  FOF formula (<kernel.Constant object at 0x2ae9d2ceab48>, <kernel.DependentProduct object at 0x2ae9d2cea5f0>) of role type named more
% 0.44/0.63  Using role type
% 0.44/0.63  Declaring more:(rat->(rat->Prop))
% 0.44/0.63  FOF formula (forall (Xx0:rat) (Xy0:rat), (((more Xx0) Xy0)->((less Xy0) Xx0))) of role axiom named satz82
% 0.44/0.63  A new axiom: (forall (Xx0:rat) (Xy0:rat), (((more Xx0) Xy0)->((less Xy0) Xx0)))
% 0.44/0.63  FOF formula (<kernel.Constant object at 0x2ae9d2cea878>, <kernel.DependentProduct object at 0x2ae9d2ceaf80>) of role type named moreis
% 0.44/0.63  Using role type
% 0.44/0.63  Declaring moreis:(rat->(rat->Prop))
% 0.44/0.63  FOF formula (forall (Xx0:rat) (Xy0:rat) (Xz0:rat) (Xu0:rat), (((moreis Xx0) Xy0)->(((more Xz0) Xu0)->((more ((pl Xx0) Xz0)) ((pl Xy0) Xu0))))) of role axiom named satz99a
% 0.44/0.63  A new axiom: (forall (Xx0:rat) (Xy0:rat) (Xz0:rat) (Xu0:rat), (((moreis Xx0) Xy0)->(((more Xz0) Xu0)->((more ((pl Xx0) Xz0)) ((pl Xy0) Xu0)))))
% 0.44/0.63  FOF formula (forall (Xx0:rat) (Xy0:rat), (((lessis Xx0) Xy0)->((moreis Xy0) Xx0))) of role axiom named satz85
% 0.44/0.63  A new axiom: (forall (Xx0:rat) (Xy0:rat), (((lessis Xx0) Xy0)->((moreis Xy0) Xx0)))
% 0.44/0.63  FOF formula (forall (Xx0:rat) (Xy0:rat), (((less Xx0) Xy0)->((more Xy0) Xx0))) of role axiom named satz83
% 0.44/0.63  A new axiom: (forall (Xx0:rat) (Xy0:rat), (((less Xx0) Xy0)->((more Xy0) Xx0)))
% 0.44/0.63  FOF formula ((less ((pl x0) z0)) ((pl y0) u0)) of role conjecture named satz99c
% 0.44/0.63  Conjecture to prove = ((less ((pl x0) z0)) ((pl y0) u0)):Prop
% 0.44/0.63  We need to prove ['((less ((pl x0) z0)) ((pl y0) u0))']
% 0.44/0.63  Parameter rat:Type.
% 0.44/0.63  Parameter x0:rat.
% 0.44/0.63  Parameter y0:rat.
% 0.44/0.63  Parameter z0:rat.
% 0.44/0.63  Parameter u0:rat.
% 0.44/0.63  Parameter lessis:(rat->(rat->Prop)).
% 0.44/0.63  Axiom l:((lessis x0) y0).
% 0.44/0.63  Parameter less:(rat->(rat->Prop)).
% 0.44/0.63  Axiom k:((less z0) u0).
% 0.44/0.63  Parameter pl:(rat->(rat->rat)).
% 0.44/0.63  Parameter more:(rat->(rat->Prop)).
% 0.44/0.63  Axiom satz82:(forall (Xx0:rat) (Xy0:rat), (((more Xx0) Xy0)->((less Xy0) Xx0))).
% 0.44/0.63  Parameter moreis:(rat->(rat->Prop)).
% 0.44/0.63  Axiom satz99a:(forall (Xx0:rat) (Xy0:rat) (Xz0:rat) (Xu0:rat), (((moreis Xx0) Xy0)->(((more Xz0) Xu0)->((more ((pl Xx0) Xz0)) ((pl Xy0) Xu0))))).
% 0.44/0.63  Axiom satz85:(forall (Xx0:rat) (Xy0:rat), (((lessis Xx0) Xy0)->((moreis Xy0) Xx0))).
% 0.44/0.63  Axiom satz83:(forall (Xx0:rat) (Xy0:rat), (((less Xx0) Xy0)->((more Xy0) Xx0))).
% 0.44/0.63  Trying to prove ((less ((pl x0) z0)) ((pl y0) u0))
% 0.44/0.63  Found satz83000:=(satz8300 k):((more u0) z0)
% 0.44/0.63  Found (satz8300 k) as proof of ((more u0) z0)
% 0.44/0.63  Found ((satz830 u0) k) as proof of ((more u0) z0)
% 0.44/0.63  Found (((satz83 z0) u0) k) as proof of ((more u0) z0)
% 0.44/0.63  Found (((satz83 z0) u0) k) as proof of ((more u0) z0)
% 0.44/0.63  Found satz85000:=(satz8500 l):((moreis y0) x0)
% 0.44/0.64  Found (satz8500 l) as proof of ((moreis y0) x0)
% 0.44/0.64  Found ((satz850 y0) l) as proof of ((moreis y0) x0)
% 0.44/0.64  Found (((satz85 x0) y0) l) as proof of ((moreis y0) x0)
% 0.44/0.64  Found (((satz85 x0) y0) l) as proof of ((moreis y0) x0)
% 0.44/0.64  Found ((satz99a0000 (((satz85 x0) y0) l)) (((satz83 z0) u0) k)) as proof of ((more ((pl y0) u0)) ((pl x0) z0))
% 0.44/0.64  Found (((satz99a000 z0) (((satz85 x0) y0) l)) (((satz83 z0) u0) k)) as proof of ((more ((pl y0) u0)) ((pl x0) z0))
% 0.44/0.64  Found ((((satz99a00 u0) z0) (((satz85 x0) y0) l)) (((satz83 z0) u0) k)) as proof of ((more ((pl y0) u0)) ((pl x0) z0))
% 0.44/0.64  Found (((((satz99a0 x0) u0) z0) (((satz85 x0) y0) l)) (((satz83 z0) u0) k)) as proof of ((more ((pl y0) u0)) ((pl x0) z0))
% 0.44/0.64  Found ((((((satz99a y0) x0) u0) z0) (((satz85 x0) y0) l)) (((satz83 z0) u0) k)) as proof of ((more ((pl y0) u0)) ((pl x0) z0))
% 0.44/0.64  Found ((((((satz99a y0) x0) u0) z0) (((satz85 x0) y0) l)) (((satz83 z0) u0) k)) as proof of ((more ((pl y0) u0)) ((pl x0) z0))
% 0.44/0.64  Found (satz8200 ((((((satz99a y0) x0) u0) z0) (((satz85 x0) y0) l)) (((satz83 z0) u0) k))) as proof of ((less ((pl x0) z0)) ((pl y0) u0))
% 0.44/0.64  Found ((satz820 ((pl x0) z0)) ((((((satz99a y0) x0) u0) z0) (((satz85 x0) y0) l)) (((satz83 z0) u0) k))) as proof of ((less ((pl x0) z0)) ((pl y0) u0))
% 0.44/0.64  Found (((satz82 ((pl y0) u0)) ((pl x0) z0)) ((((((satz99a y0) x0) u0) z0) (((satz85 x0) y0) l)) (((satz83 z0) u0) k))) as proof of ((less ((pl x0) z0)) ((pl y0) u0))
% 0.44/0.64  Found (((satz82 ((pl y0) u0)) ((pl x0) z0)) ((((((satz99a y0) x0) u0) z0) (((satz85 x0) y0) l)) (((satz83 z0) u0) k))) as proof of ((less ((pl x0) z0)) ((pl y0) u0))
% 0.44/0.64  Got proof (((satz82 ((pl y0) u0)) ((pl x0) z0)) ((((((satz99a y0) x0) u0) z0) (((satz85 x0) y0) l)) (((satz83 z0) u0) k)))
% 0.44/0.64  Time elapsed = 0.092979s
% 0.44/0.64  node=18 cost=219.000000 depth=13
% 0.44/0.64::::::::::::::::::::::
% 0.44/0.64  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.44/0.64  % SZS output start Proof for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.44/0.64  (((satz82 ((pl y0) u0)) ((pl x0) z0)) ((((((satz99a y0) x0) u0) z0) (((satz85 x0) y0) l)) (((satz83 z0) u0) k)))
% 0.44/0.64  % SZS output end Proof for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------